Home News From Transnational to Transcalar: Re-envisioning Advocacy in a Altering World

From Transnational to Transcalar: Re-envisioning Advocacy in a Altering World


Worldwide advocacy has an extended historical past, reaching again centuries to abolitionism and early girls’s rights actions (Drucker, 1981; Limoncelli, 2006; Miers, 1998). But as a topic of scholarly inquiry in worldwide relations, worldwide advocacy solely started attracting vital scholarly attention within the Nineteen Nineties. As the top of the Cold War freed policymakers from frequently balancing East-West energy, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) discovered growing success in lobbying for brand new world insurance policies. NGOs fomented coverage change on the World Financial institution, drove the creation of the World Fee on Dams, and persuaded states to signal the Ottawa Conference banning landmines (Anderson, 2000; Charnovitz, 1996; Davies, 2013; Fox & Brown, 1998).

Keck and Sikkink’s (1998) Activists past Borders: Advocacy Networks in Worldwide Politics was a landmark effort to elucidate and theorize this new worldwide phenomenon. They superior what grew to become generally known as the boomerang concept of transnational advocacy. In line with the speculation, transnational advocacy networks type when native activists are blocked (typically by their native or nationwide authorities) of their efforts to alter native insurance policies or practices and reply by reaching out to worldwide NGOs for help. These worldwide NGOs rally the help of international governments or worldwide establishments, which apply strain to the actors inflicting the blockage. Advocacy thus flows in a local-international-local sample.

Whereas Keck and Sikkink’s concept had broad implications, students making use of their work typically used it in a slender method, resulting in quite a few limitations and lacuna within the literature on transnational advocacy. First, most students centered on NGOs as the first actors in worldwide advocacy; thus, the research of transnational advocacy networks grew to become the research of transnational networks of NGOs. Second, native activists initiating the boomerang have been typically assumed to be positioned within the low- and middle-income nations of the worldwide South, whereas their worldwide companions have been assumed to be primarily based within the high-income nations of the worldwide North. The local-international-local sample that Keck and Sikkink posited was thus diminished to a South-North-South sample, wherein transnational advocacy occurred as well-meaning Northern actors sought to assist oppressed or marginalized Southern populations, embedding a definite energy dynamic. Third, totally different definitions of transnational advocacy have been used relying on whether or not the actors have been from the worldwide North or the worldwide South. Northern NGOs have been described as partaking in transnational advocacy after they addressed worldwide coverage points or labored throughout borders, even when they undertook that advocacy alone, whereas Southern NGOs have been described as partaking in transnational advocacy primarily after they engaged with worldwide companions. 

In 2017, a bunch of students convened to start addressing these analysis challenges, assisted by funding from the Worldwide Research Affiliation. We acknowledged that the aforementioned limitations had empirical roots within the central function performed by Northern NGOs in worldwide politics within the Nineteen Nineties and early 2000s. Nevertheless, we additionally noticed that these assumptions not mirrored empirical realities and have been actively hindering students’ capability to acknowledge and clarify a brand new wave of advocacy on worldwide points, a lot of it being led by Southern actors. The dialogue begun in 2017 culminated within the publication of Beyond the Boomerang: From Transnational Advocacy Networks to Transcalar Advocacy in International Politics in March 2022.

Drawing on analysis we carried out in locations like Brazil, Mexico, and Vietnam, the quantity provides two key observations about how advocacy has modified because the growth of the boomerang concept (Pallas & Nguyen, 2018; Rodrigues, 2016; Starobin, 2018). First, structural adjustments on the world degree have restricted Northern NGOs’ affect with policymakers and diminished their entry to companions within the world South (Heiss & Chaudhry, 2018; Heiss & Kelley, 2017; Uhlin, 2016). For instance, the growing autonomy of nationwide branches of worldwide NGOs like Greenpeace Brazil and the rise of nationwide organizations just like the China Civil Change Action Network present different companions and sources of coverage experience that resonate extra with their nationwide authorities (Henry & Sundstrom, 2022; Rodrigues, 2022). More and more authoritarian governments have additionally limited national organizations’ access to international funding as a quiet technique of closing civil society house with out straight attacking constitutional rights to freedom of affiliation or expression. With out help from overseas, many organizations should stop operation, as witnessed by the demise or relocation of teams in Egypt, Ethiopia, Russia, Cambodia, Hungary, and India, to call a couple of (Chaudhry & Heiss, 2022).

A pattern of opening entry to worldwide organizations has accompanied the pattern of closing civil society house at residence. Whereas some advocacy campaigns have been pressured to function at extra native ranges by the shortage of worldwide companions, different campaigns have discovered success at world ranges by partaking with intergovernmental organizations such because the United Nations. For instance, even historically closed organizations just like the Asian Development Bank have developed formal institutional mechanisms to collaborate with civil society organizations and NGOs (Uhlin, 2022).

Diminished worldwide NGO entry to nationwide organizations and governments has been accompanied by a further structural impact. The event of South-South networks has restricted Southern NGOs’ want for Northern help. Beforehand, Northern NGOs served as coordinators of worldwide networks and as subject material specialists, sharing data and experience with Southern counterparts. They’ve additionally typically claimed to be the first representatives of Southern voices. South-South networks have changed Northern NGOs in every of those roles. Networks just like the Latin American Community for Truthful, Democratic, and Sustainable Cities (RLCJDS) coordinate monitoring and advocacy (Appe, 2022). The Dhaka-based Southern Voice created a “digital data hub” to compile analysis from Africa, Asia, and Latin America in regards to the social and economic effects of COVID-19. Such networks additionally search to articulate a Southern perspective in worldwide conversations, typically particularly countering the language and approaches of Northern NGOs (Appe, 2022).

Second, the company and id of advocates has modified. Southern NGOs have improved their organizational capability and are more and more in a position to make use of native political methods to withstand or modify the implementation of worldwide insurance policies of their nations (Pallas & Nguyen, 2022; Rodrigues, 2022). In so doing, they’re typically allied with a brand new solid of advocates, together with authorities actors and companies (Henry & Sundstrom, 2022; Starobin, 2022). 

In Vietnam, for instance, high-capacity native NGOs within the HIV/AIDS sector efficiently used inside lobbying techniques to reform the insurance policies of worldwide donors and technical companies funding HIV/AIDS work in Vietnam (Pallas & Nguyen, 2022). NGOs in Thailand have used the same method to foyer the World Fund to Combat AIDS, Malaria, and Tuberculosis to proceed its funding for work in that nation (Pallas and Stewart, forthcoming). In Brazil, native NGOs utilizing outdoors lobbying techniques succeeded into drawing worldwide consideration to the environmental impacts of the Brazilian oil business with none Northern help; when international NGOs later joined the trouble, they did so in a horizontal, peer function, somewhat than as senior companions (Rodrigues, 2022).

We even have witnessed a rise within the variety of actors engaged in advocacy on worldwide points. From Mayan beekeepers to Buddhist monks to Maasai chiefs to crowdsourced platforms like Avaaz, nonstate actors tackle a larger vary of organizational varieties, sizes, points, and sources (Cloward, 2016; Corridor, 2017; Starobin, 2018). Whereas not all of those actors intend to be worldwide advocates, they’re affected by worldwide politics and insurance policies and so reply to them. In so doing, they form the worldwide dialogue round insurance policies and their implementation throughout scales and places in additional complicated fashions than imagined beforehand.

Based mostly on these knowledge, we decided that modern advocacy in worldwide politics is healthier conceptualized as transcalar than as transnational. Transcalar advocacy describes efforts to alter the insurance policies or practices of different actors when these efforts transcend totally different ranges or “scales” of motion, such because the municipal, nationwide, regional, or world. The time period discards assumptions that native advocacy should cross nationwide borders or enlist worldwide companions to have an effect on the content material or software of worldwide coverage. It additionally discards the idea that advocacy is dependent upon NGOs as initiators or key companions.

In consequence, the idea captures a a lot fuller image of latest advocacy, involving a greater diversity of initiating actors, companions, and targets. It additionally acknowledges the wide range of instructions wherein affect can move, together with North-South, South-North, and South-South. Mayan beekeepers partnering with native companies to make use of the Mexican courts to focus on a multinational company are doing transcalar advocacy (Starobin, 2022). So too are Chinese language NGOs partnering with their nationwide authorities to have an effect on world agreements on local weather change (Henry & Sundstrom, 2022) and Masai chiefs working to finish the implementation world norms in opposition to feminine genital mutilation in Kenya (Cloward, 2022).

To clarify how advocacy can take such various varieties, we developed a brand new concept of activism that fashions marketing campaign formation as a sequence of strategic choices. In every marketing campaign, activists must make interdependent choices about scale of operations, their goal, the kind of advocacy, and potential companions. In follow, organizations could not take a linear method to those selections, however modeling the choices as a sequence helps illustrate the methods choices are contingent.

First, activists should choose a scale of motion, corresponding to native, nationwide, regional, or world, for his or her marketing campaign. For instance, activists engaged on local weather change can select to focus on municipal insurance policies on native industrial emissions or the worldwide requirements nations set underneath the Paris Accord’s Nationally Determined Contributions.

Subsequent, activists should select the targets of their advocacy, corresponding to governments or personal actors (e.g., companies and even NGOs). For instance, activists desirous to make vaccinations in opposition to COVID-19 extra accessible may goal the producer Pfizer to push for discounted rates for poorer nations, the United Nation’s COVAX program to regulate distribution plans to prioritize nations with the least entry to vaccines or the government of Canada to offer extra funding for vaccines to COVAX. A few of these targets, nevertheless, could also be roughly accessible, relying on the dimensions of motion the activists have chosen.

Activists additionally must determine in the event that they want to work inside present establishments for change, through inside advocacy, or protest from outdoors of the system for extra dramatic change. Inside methods typically go unnoticed by most of the people, whereas outdoors methods, like the trucker convoy protests in Ottawa in opposition to masks and vaccine mandates, can appeal to vital media consideration. Activists might also leverage some institutional actors in opposition to others utilizing the courtroom system, as an example, to pressure a change within the insurance policies or habits of different state actors.

Lastly, activists additionally must determine in the event that they wish to work alone or with companions and, if they need companions, which companions to decide on and tips on how to collaborate with them. Whereas we observe the expansion of public-private partnerships such because the Forest Stewardship Council (Henry & Sundstrom, 2022) and of regional networks just like the Latin American Community for Truthful, Democratic and Sustainable Cities (Appe, 2022), more and more activist teams additionally work independently, solely seeming to collaborate inadvertently as a result of they share related targets or objectives.

Based mostly on these empirically grounded observations in regards to the altering nature of worldwide structure and nonstate company, we developed a number of predictions for doubtless future activism and advocacy campaigns. First, Southern-based and Southern-directed advocacy will improve as extra states arrive at middle-income standing. Center-income states usually tend to have high-capacity advocacy organizations staffed by well-educated professionals who select advocacy work out of a way of ardour or calling somewhat than in response to a shortage of formal-sector jobs. Furthermore, restrictive state environments for NGOs, like in Vietnam or China, can speed up the event of such extremely succesful NGOs by concentrating sources in a smaller variety of organizations. 

Second, we anticipate activists to decide on companions designed to reinforce the attraction of their message to the important thing audiences on the scale they’ve chosen. Thus, Chinese language local weather change activists lobbying on world coverage select to companion with the Chinese language authorities (Henry & Sundstrom, 2022), whereas activists in Rio de Janiero, looking for to problem the nationwide oil firm Petrobras’ air pollution of the Baia de Guanabara, partnered with nationwide environmental NGOs, labor unions, {and professional} associations positioned in Brazil (Rodrigues, 2022). The end result can be campaigns that look very totally different from the expectation of the boomerang mannequin that the first companions of native activists can be giant worldwide NGOs. Advances in world communication will even make it simpler for activists to seek out companions with related methods and outlooks, limiting the necessity for compromise and negotiation. Thus, we additionally anticipate to see much less advertising and reframing of native causes on the a part of activists looking for to draw worldwide companions to their causes (c.f. Bob, 2005).

Third, the discount in entry to nationwide NGOs will encourage worldwide NGOs to have interaction in additional footloose campaigns missing a transparent nationwide foundation. The forerunner of such efforts is The Worldwide Marketing campaign to Abolition Nuclear Weapons, which by no means gained a lot traction within the two nations the place the marketing campaign was initiated, america and the UK, but scored a serious worldwide victory in 1996 when the International Court of Justice decided that the usage of, or menace of use of, nuclear weapons was unlawful.

We predict that the empirical knowledge on transcalar advocacy will proceed to build up, as new coalitions of activists foyer native and worldwide policymakers or enlist nationwide and subnational authorities companies as companions of their advocacy actions. The boomerang sample of advocacy could proceed to persist in sure cases, however will more and more give technique to extra domestically knowledgeable and domestically managed efforts to form the content material, implementation, or affect of worldwide insurance policies and pressures: a brand new period of transcalar activism.


Anderson, Okay. (2000). The Ottawa Conference banning landmines, the function of worldwide non-governmental organizations and the thought of worldwide civil society—EJIL. European Journal of Worldwide Legislation, 11(1), 91–120.

Appe, S. (2022). South-South Networks amongst NGOs. In C. Pallas & E. A. Bloodgood (Eds.), Past the boomerang: From transnational advocacy networks to transcalar advocacy in worldwide politics (pp. 49–61). The College of Alabama Press.

Bob, C. (2005). The advertising of rise up: Insurgents, media, and worldwide activism. Cambridge College Press.

Charnovitz, S. (1996). Two Centuries of Participation: NGOs and Worldwide Governance. 18(w), 183.

Chaudhry, S., & Heiss, A. (2022). Closing Area and the Restructuring of World Activism: Causes and Penalties of the World Crackdown on NGOs. In C. Pallas & E. A. Bloodgood (Eds.), Past the boomerang: From transnational advocacy networks to transcalar advocacy in worldwide politics (pp. 23–35). The College of Alabama Press.

Cloward, Okay. (2016). When norms collide: Native responses to activism in opposition to feminine genital mutilation and early marriage. Oxford College Press.

Cloward, Okay. (2022). Compliant States, Reluctant Communities? Transcalar Activism in opposition to Gender-Based mostly Violence. In C. Pallas & E. A. Bloodgood (Eds.), Past the boomerang: From transnational advocacy networks to transcalar advocacy in worldwide politics (pp. 139–158). The College of Alabama Press.

Davies, T. (2013). NGOs: A New Historical past of Transnational Civil Society. Hurst & Firm.

Drucker, A. R. (1981). The Affect of Western Ladies on the Anti-Footbinding Motion 1840-1911. Historic Reflections / Réflexions Historiques, 8(3), 179–199. JSTOR.

Fox, J., & Brown, L. D. (Eds.). (1998). The battle for accountability: The World Financial institution, NGOs, and grassroots actions. MIT Press.

Corridor, N. (2017). Folks Energy, Populism and the Web | World Coverage Journal. https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/weblog/11/07/2017/people-power-populism-and-internet

Heiss, A., & Chaudhry, S. (2018). Charity Throughout Crackdown: Analyzing the Impression of State Repression of NGOs on Philanthropy. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/FG53W

Heiss, A., & Kelley, J. (2017). Between a Rock and a Arduous Place: Worldwide NGOs and the Twin Pressures of Donors and Host Governments. The Journal of Politics, 79(2), 732–741. https://doi.org/10.1086/691218

Henry, L. A., & Sundstrom, L. M. (2022). Altering Climages in Russia and China: NGOs and Transcalar Local weather Advocacy in Authoritarian States. In C. Pallas & E. A. Bloodgood (Eds.), Past the boomerang: From transnational advocacy networks to transcalar advocacy in worldwide politics (pp. 159–173). The College of Alabama Press.

Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, Okay. (1998). Activists past borders: Advocacy networks in worldwide politics. Cornell College Press.

Limoncelli, S. A. (2006). Worldwide Voluntary Associations, Native Social Actions and State Paths to the Abolition of Regulated Prostitution in Europe, 1875–1950. Worldwide Sociology, 21(1), 31–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580906059290

Miers, S. (1998). Slavery and the slave commerce as worldwide points 1890–1939. Slavery & Abolition, 19(2), 16–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/01440399808575237

Pallas, C. L., & Nguyen, L. (2018). Transnational Advocacy With out Northern NGO Companions: Vietnamese NGOs within the HIV/AIDS Sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(4_suppl), 159S-176S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018758462

Pallas, C. L., & Nguyen, L. P. (2022). Transnational Advocacy and Growing Native Company: Vietnamese NGOs within the HIV/AIDS Sector. In C. Pallas & E. A. Bloodgood (Eds.), Past the boomerang: From transnational advocacy networks to transcalar advocacy in worldwide politics (pp. 125–138). The College of Alabama Press.

Rodrigues, M. G. M. (2016). The prospects for transnational advocacy throughout the IBSA bloc – a view from Brazil. Third World Quarterly, 37(4), 703–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1116367

Rodrigues, M. G. M. (2022). Assessing Prospects for Transnational Activism in opposition to the World Oil Trade: Classes from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. In C. Pallas & E. A. Bloodgood (Eds.), Past the boomerang: From transnational advocacy networks to transcalar advocacy in worldwide politics (pp. 110–124). The College of Alabama Press.

Starobin, S. M. (2018). Beekeepers Versus Biotech: Commodity Traits and Regulatory Interdependence within the World Environmental Politics of Meals. World Environmental Politics, 18(2), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00459

Starobin, S. M. (2022). Downscaling Contestation in World GMO Governance: Difficult Transnational Actors on the Subnational Stage in Mexico. In C. Pallas & E. A. Bloodgood (Eds.), Past the boomerang: From transnational advocacy networks to transcalar advocacy in worldwide politics (pp. 97–109). The College of Alabama Press.

Uhlin, A. (2016). Civil society and regional governance: The Asian Improvement Financial institution and the Affiliation of Southeast Asian Nations. Lexington Books.

Uhlin, A. (2022). Opening Up of Worldwide Organizations. In C. Pallas & E. A. Bloodgood (Eds.), Past the boomerang: From transnational advocacy networks to transcalar advocacy in worldwide politics (pp. 36–48). The College of Alabama Press.

Additional Studying on E-Worldwide Relations